Download this chapter (PDF)
Digital Trust Frameworks: from hierarchical to distributed trust

Much of the trust we place in credentials comes from verification by authoritative sources; we cannot rely solely on a person’s own claim. This is why educational institutions are considered authoritative when issuing diplomas and credentials. Institutions must verify that the individual attended courses or examinations, and the institution itself must be verifiably accredited.

Current trust frameworks that support this system are largely hierarchical. New standards, such as OpenID Federation, enable non-hierarchical trust, complementing existing identity federations and allowing for more independent collaborations.

However, this does not eliminate the need for trust. Authorities are still required for accrediting institutions and credentials. Additionally, when processes demand a high level of trust, further technical checks and organisational rules and regulations are necessary.

Impact

education

Education

  • The role of institutions in the education data ecosystem is evolving, and requests for data and access to tools come from both within and outside of the ecosystem. Therefore, establishing trust in credential authenticity will become more challenging.
Research

Research

  • The EU Digital Identity framework’s influence on the adoption of digital wallets in research and education, and its effects on trust frameworks, is subject to ongoing research.
Operations

Operations

  • Institutions must determine how credentials can be reliably attributed to individuals. This requires identity verification at enrolment, during assessments and perhaps even attendance.
More info about Digital Trust?
Visit surf.nl
Link SURF icoon